|
|
Post by vance winsor on Apr 16, 2006 19:52:45 GMT -5
What type of animal is a Bigfoot. Think about it before you answer.
Vance
|
|
|
|
Post by greywolf on Apr 21, 2006 20:33:47 GMT -5
I think BF is a species or if you prefer a missing link between man and preman/ape that just did not die off...
|
|
|
|
Post by vance winsor on Apr 22, 2006 11:26:19 GMT -5
Hi Greywolf: I did not think to add the missing link one but its too late now. I don't think that bigfoot is a missing link, this would present a lot of different problems. Janice Carter in her book '50 years with bigfoot' thinks that Bigfoot is a decendent of Esau in the Bible cause he is a very hairy man. This would have had very hard to do. First language. It would have taken several people a number of years to write down the new language and to learn it and then to teach it to others. Second body structure. They would have had to learn to walk in a sort of different fashion. Their body structure would have had to been changed, longer arms, greater strength, walking stride longer, walking speed higher, their whole athletic ability would have to been changed and their physical strength would have had to be changed as well. A whole lifestyle of changes for these links to learn. I don't see Bigfoot as a missing link. I believe he is purly animal of its own species.
Vance
|
|
|
|
Post by vance winsor on Apr 26, 2006 2:12:53 GMT -5
Hi Greywolf: I made a mistake. It was not Janice Cater who said that bigfoot was as a descendent of bigfoot but rather her grandfather said it, a reference to her was made right below his statement but I remembered the statement about her book or her which is stated below his statement, instead of his statement. Til Later
Vance
|
|
|
|
Post by vance winsor on Apr 26, 2006 18:27:56 GMT -5
"Descendent of Esau" not bigfoot. My mistake.
Vance
|
|
